[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IWD+ifupdown instead of wpasupplicant and systemd-resolved?



Hi,

On Sunday, 02 January at 17:40, riveravaldez wrote:

> Hi, I have an old desktop machine with Debian 11, running fine, as usual.
> Recently I bought a USB/Wi-Fi dongle/adapter to connect it to my home WLAN.
> The chipset and correspondent firmware blob seem to be the 'MediaTek
> MT7601U firmware, version 34 (mt7601u.bin)', available in the
> `firmware-misc-nonfree` package.
> 
> After reading:
> https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/sect.network-config
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html
> https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi
> https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware
> https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/HowToUse
> 
> , and some linked pages, I installed `firmware-misc-nonfree`,
> rebooted, and configured the interface like this:
> 
> $ iwctl
> [iwd]# station wlan4 connect "Fibertel WiFi238 2.4GHz"
> 
> Input passphrase and done. I'm connected.
> 
> [iwd]# station wlan4 show
>                                  Station: wlan4                               *
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Settable  Property            Value
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Scanning            no
>             State               connected
>             Connected network   Fibertel WiFi238 2.4GHz
>             ConnectedBss        b8:66:85:fd:0a:d1
>             Frequency           2462
>             Security            WPA2-Personal
>             RSSI                -77                  dBm
>             AverageRSSI         -76                  dBm
>             RxMode              802.11n
>             RxMCS               4
>             TxMode              802.11n
>             TxMCS               4
>             TxBitrate           43300                Kbit/s
>             RxBitrate           39000                Kbit/s
>             ExpectedThroughput  15937                Kbit/s
> 
> Then:
> 
> $ sudo nano /etc/network/interfaces
> 
> , and added:
> 
> ```
> allow-hotplug wlan4
> iface wlan4 inet dhcp
> ```

Here I've just got the 'loopback interface network':

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

iwd takes care of raising the interface on boot. There is no need for
ifupdown.

> 
> And then:
> 
> $ sudo ifup wlan4
> 
> And done. Everything seems to be working perfectly. I've got this:
> 
> $ cat /etc/resolv.conf
> domain fibertel.com.ar
> search fibertel.com.ar
> nameserver 192.168.0.1
> 
> $ ip route list
> default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlan4
> 192.168.0.0/24 dev wlan4 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.168
> 
> $ ip link show
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> 2: enp0s7: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN
> mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>     link/ether 6c:f0:49:9b:b5:13 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 11: wlan4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state
> UP mode DORMANT group default qlen 1000
>     link/ether 20:e9:17:0d:5d:9e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> $ sudo ifconfig
> lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
>         inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
>         inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
>         loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
>         RX packets 71  bytes 9188 (8.9 KiB)
>         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
>         TX packets 71  bytes 9188 (8.9 KiB)
>         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
> 
> wlan4: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>         inet 192.168.0.168  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255
>         inet6 fe80::22e9:17ff:fe0d:5d9e  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
>         ether 20:e9:17:0d:5d:9e  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>         RX packets 66525  bytes 17810025 (16.9 MiB)
>         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
>         TX packets 72346  bytes 12467100 (11.8 MiB)
>         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
> 
> All this seems OK?
> 
> I'm asking because the Debian wiki proposes (I think) two different schemes:
> - ifupdown with wpasupplicant, iw, wireless-tools, etc.
> - iwd enabling `EnableNetworkConfiguration=true` in /etc/iwd/main.conf
> and setting the name resolving service with `systemd-resolved`
> 
> , and I did neither:

Here I differ with:

[Settings]
AutoConnect=true

# enable builtin DHCP-client within iwd for wifi
EnableNetworkConfiguration=true

[Network] 
RoutePriorityOffset=200
NameResolvingService=systemd
# EnableIPv6=true

# randomizes mac-address every time iwd starts or the hardware is initially detected
AddressRandomization=once

[Scan]
# DisablePeriodicScan=true

I use systemd-resolved.

> 
> $ systemctl status systemd-networkd.service
> ● systemd-networkd.service - Network Service
>      Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service;
> disabled; vendor>
>      Active: inactive (dead)
> TriggeredBy: ● systemd-networkd.socket
>        Docs: man:systemd-networkd.service(8)
> 
> , but apparently a mix between both schemes (my "understanding" of the
> situation is that iwd creates/manages the connection between the
> adapter and the router, and ifupdown with /etc/network/interfaces
> sets/configures the interface for the system and the DNS resolution,
> because I never installed the `resolvconf` package).
> 
> Now, is this proper/right/reliable?
> Should I do something different?
> Is it normal/irrelevant that I receive once and again the local IP
> address 192.168.0.168 (meaning, the last one of all)?
> 
> And finally: if this is another possible/simpler solution, should I
> (or anyone better equipped) add it to the wiki for other people's use?

Letting iwd and systemd-resolved take care of networking is I find
simple. Both have been over the last year very reliable. Another good
source for information on iwd is the arch wiki and also the iwd website.

> 
> Thanks a lot in advance and I desire everybody a wonderful year's beginning!

-- 
All the best
Wim


Reply to: