On 2021-12-19 3:13 a.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Sb, 18 dec 21, 14:22:58, David Newman wrote: >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 12:44, Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 3:56 AM Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Jo, 09 dec 21, 23:24:11, Marco Möller wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a pity that Debian cannot be flexible to offer more secure and already >>>>>> available binary versions of software for the assumed many users only caring >>>>>> for installing a binary from the official Debian repository on some very >>>>> .... >>>> ARM64 is likely to see *more* (not less) use in desktops and laptops, >>>> and RISC V might also be an option in the future. >>> >>> >>> Maybe I missed something. Why RISC V? >> >> RISC V is open-source hardware, free of encumbrances from commercial licenses and fees. Would you have some suggestion if I'd like to try out a Risc-V board ? Would be interested in building a test system on this architectures. Do you have some links for buying already built board (and possibly that would include some type of graphic hardware if it's possible). Something like a Raspberry Pi but with a Risc-V chipset ? Thanks > > As well as free from embargoes, so it might be very interesting for chip > makers in countries affected by such. > > It's also quite promising in the performance per watt area and > performance per square mm, even compared to ARM (which is already better > than x86 chips). > > Kind regards, > Andrei > -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature