On Sb, 18 dec 21, 14:22:58, David Newman wrote: > On Dec 18, 2021, at 12:44, Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 3:56 AM Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Jo, 09 dec 21, 23:24:11, Marco Möller wrote: > >>> > > >>> > It's a pity that Debian cannot be flexible to offer more secure and already > >>> > available binary versions of software for the assumed many users only caring > >>> > for installing a binary from the official Debian repository on some very > >>> .... > >> ARM64 is likely to see *more* (not less) use in desktops and laptops, > >> and RISC V might also be an option in the future. > > > > > > Maybe I missed something. Why RISC V? > > RISC V is open-source hardware, free of encumbrances from commercial licenses and fees. As well as free from embargoes, so it might be very interesting for chip makers in countries affected by such. It's also quite promising in the performance per watt area and performance per square mm, even compared to ARM (which is already better than x86 chips). Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature