[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why Debian?



For me Debian strikes a nice balance between convenience and staying out
of my way and preserving my changes when I want to customize things.  As
mentioned, apt, though I like using aptitude through its TUI mostly,
handles dependencies not just for installing but for removing packages
as well.  When the debconf system detects that a configuration file
(most often found under /etc) has been modified, it will prompt for a
resolution (I have dealt with distributions that weren't so careful).

The Debian developers often set sensible defaults that mesh well with
the system and often modify a package to make it easier to administer.
The security team does a good job of responding to issues and updating
needed packages.  Over the years it has become obvious to me that the
developers care deeply about the distribution and this is reflected in
the quality of the past several releases (all have been good since I
first installed Debian 2.1 (Slink) back in late summer 1999, but past
several have shown the project has the process down pat).

The project is committed to Free Software yet has not forgotten that
sometimes pragmatism dictates that users need to use non-free packages
to accomplish their tasks.  Fortunately, most of the non-free packages
that are needed these days are kernel modules.

HTH,

- Nate

-- 
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
Web: https://www.n0nb.us
Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: