Re: Buster to bullseye upgrade: Worth it or not?

To: Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Buster to bullseye upgrade: Worth it or not?
From: local10 <local10@tutanota.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:41:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] MlqEEDw--7-2@tutanota.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 24dd2aab-34ed-4f20-a15e-d0fd7e4c2459@www.fastmail.com>
References: <[🔎] MljQxrW--B-2@tutanota.com> <[🔎] 24dd2aab-34ed-4f20-a15e-d0fd7e4c2459@www.fastmail.com>

Oct 12, 2021, 13:40 by debian@david.palacio.io:

> I run Bullseye and I find it very solid and trouble free. Though I didn't upgrade from Buster but instead used to run unstable and switched to stable when it released. Bullseye's KDE is very good and I have no issues with it other than I don't recommend you to run a Wayland session of it, you should stick with X11 for the time being. There exists unofficial repositories by a Debian/KDE packager if you wish to get more recent KDE software releases built for Bullseye.
>


Glad to hear that everything is well with KDE in bullseye, I'm running X11 too.

Thanks to everyone who responded.

Reply to:

References:
- Buster to bullseye upgrade: Worth it or not?
  - From: local10 <local10@tutanota.com>
- Re: Buster to bullseye upgrade: Worth it or not?
  - From: "David Palacio" <debian@david.palacio.io>

Prev by Date: Building a package for ScummVM 2.5.0
Next by Date: Re: Building a package for ScummVM 2.5.0
Previous by thread: Re: Buster to bullseye upgrade: Worth it or not?
Next by thread: Re: Re: LUKS encryption help
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread