Re: Canonical way to configure bonds for Bullseye
George Shuklin wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> We are building Debian bullsye images for our bare-metal servers, and there
> is a bit of ambiguity on 'canonical way to configure network bonds'.
> Wiki gives options with ifenslave and systemd-networkd, and there is an
> option to do it with post-up and ip route.
> ifenslave is broken due to #991930, but it can be easily patched.
>
>
> Which way is least surprise for a Debian user (for you)?
>
> 1. bond-slaves in interfaces
>
> Example:
>
> auto bond0
>
> iface bond0
>
> inet static
>
> bond-slaves eth0 eth1
bond interfaces imply a nice static config, so the interfaces
file is definitely least surprising.
-dsr-
Reply to: