Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem
Gareth Evans <donotspam@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> So I would like to know if apt is not handling this properly, or if
> the scenario of a file changing packages (see David's previous email)
> is an expected exception to the (sort of) rule.
> Shouldn't pitivi 0.999 be disregarded anyway as it's being upgraded?
No, because Debian Policy says that partial upgrades are supported and
must work.
> It's not a conflict involving two Bullseye packages, nor with one from
> Bullseye and one held/pinned etc, so I don't see why it should happen.
This might be a genuine bug in one of the two packages here, where a
Conflict/Breaks/Replaces dependendy was needed to move a file from one
package to another.
I think https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965007 is part
of that problem.
Grüße,
S°
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Reply to: