[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: On improving mailing list [was: How to Boot Linux ISO Images Directly From Your Hard Drive Debian]



On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:33:08AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 03:26:25PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> >To be honest I don't think that mailing lists are a very good venue
> >for user support and I would these days prefer to direct people to a
> >Stack Overflow-like site.
> 
> I agree with you to some extent. I've wondered for a long while whether
> Mailman 3 and it's "HyperKitty" web front-end could be a solution.

If it bears any similarity to classic mailman, then colour me
unimpressed. My pet peeve with that one is that it cuts lists
into month sized slices (which makes kind of sense when you
want a month view, but puts you in an awkward place when you're
reading a thread which crosses one (or several!) month boundaries).

Don't get me wrong. Searchable archives "out there" are invaluable,
and whoever tries to unify mailing lists and fora is in my eyes
a hero -- but I fear the core problem is not a technical one.

Imagine just that "+1" thingie: how do those who participate via
mail get to "see" that? Doesn't that lead to both groups's "views
of the world" slowly diverging?

I think this happens at a very fundamental level: in the "mail
world": "protocol" [1] is separate from user agent. The ones
are using mutt, the others thunderbird or claws, a third one
(horrors!) some kind of web mail and a fourth one (even more
horrors!) outlook. This is known, so most of us know that the
MUA's visual appearance is not part of the message.

As opposed to a web application, where one visual appearance
is forced onto^H^H^H [2] offered to all participants; the
separation is not so clear.

Bridging both worlds takes more than a couple of smart algorithms.

All I have seen up to now is done as web design is done
these days: you start with a wireframe [3], then...

The result for me is "thanks, but no, thanks".

Cheers

[1] in a very general sense: alternatively: "data model"
[2] here you see my bias. I can't hide it.
[3] i.e. the starting point of the design is a visual
   one.

 - t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: