[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls"



Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> writes:

> On a Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) machine:
>
> $ ls -ld /etc/systemd
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2021-04-19 09:40:41 /etc/systemd
> $ ls /etc/systemd
> ls: cannot open directory '/etc/systemd': No such file or directory
>
> Any explanation???

snowball:776$ ls -ld /etc/systemd
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Jun 17 11:20 /etc/systemd/
snowball:777$ ls /etc/systemd
journald.conf  logind.conf  network/  networkd.conf  pstore.conf  resolved.conf  sleep.conf  system/  system.conf  user/  user.conf
snowball:778$ stat /etc/systemd
  File: /etc/systemd
  Size: 4096      	Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   directory
Device: 901h/2305d	Inode: 16517453    Links: 5
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2021-06-23 11:04:12.898744989 -0600
Modify: 2021-06-17 11:20:15.302495478 -0600
Change: 2021-06-17 11:20:15.302495478 -0600
 Birth: 2012-10-03 22:45:10.910122061 -0600

I'm with the people guessing you've got FS corruption.


Reply to: