[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k)



On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 17 ian 21, 20:12:38, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 16 Jan 2021 at 20:57:19 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:

[...]

> > >  This
> > > may have advantages and disadvantages, but you don't get to control
> > > those :)
> > 
> > In terms of control, the burnt-in firmware cannot cannot be controlled
> > either. I do not know where this gets us.

I don't know what was ambiguous in what I said. I said "you don't get
to control when (and what kind of) an update arrives".

No more, no less. In the case of a burnt-in firmware, you get to work
with a "known xxx" [1] state. You lear to know (and possibly circumvent)
bugs, backdoors and other old fellas.

> Besides, the manufacturer might even fix some bugs in the firmware.

Or to insert new and nastier backdoors, as mandated by their
local government (or by their new, ad-industry fueled corporate
overlords, or by whomever whose interests might not align with
yours).

Did I say "advantages and disadvantages?

Cheers

[1] for "xxx" in "good", "bad" and any other suitable value in
   between.

 - t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: