Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:45:51 +0300
Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:19:01AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:02:22 +0300
> > Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> wrote:
...
> > > Indeed. Switch back to fetchmail, because the less you're depending on
> > > python and the software that uses it - the better ;)
> >
> > Here's the getmail author's opinion of why getmail is preferable to
> > fetchmail:
> >
> > http://pyropus.ca/software/getmail/faq.html#faq-about-why
> >
> > Doubtless opinionated, and certainly dated, but would you or anyone
> > else here care to comment?
>
> It boils down to two things:
>
> 1) Configuration of fetchmail is teh hard.
>
> If I have to choose between hard-to-configure software and will-cease-to
> function software - I always go with the first variety. YMMV.
>
>
> 2) Fetchmail is insecure, getmail is bulletproof.
>
> As [1] and [2] show us - it's true somewhat. fetchmail has 5 times more
> known vulnerabilities than getmail.
> Problem with such numbers approach is - last reported CVE for fetchmail
> is dated 2012, and for getmail it's 2014. I.e. both can be considered
> secure enough in this regard.
...
Thanks.
Celejar
Reply to:
- References:
- getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3
- From: songbird <songbird@anthive.com>
- Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3
- From: mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com>
- Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3
- From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
- Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3
- From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
- Re: getmail, getmail6, testing, unstable, python-is-python3
- From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>