[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: qemu - some confusions



Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> writes:

> Kamil Jo?ca wrote: 
>> 
>> I try to migrate some my ancient virutal machines from virtualbox to
>> qemu, and some things are unclear for me.
>> 1. scsi devices:
>> 
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> %qemu-system-x86_64 -device help|grep lsi      
>> name "lsi53c810", bus PCI                               
>> name "lsi53c895a", bus PCI, alias "lsi"
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> 
>> but in  /usr/share/libvirt/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>> we have:
>> 
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>               <attribute name="model">
>>                 <choice>
>>                   <value>auto</value>
>>                   <value>buslogic</value>
>>                   <value>lsilogic</value>
>>                   <value>lsisas1068</value>
>>                   <value>vmpvscsi</value>
>>                   <value>ibmvscsi</value>
>>                   <value>virtio-scsi</value>
>>                   <value>lsisas1078</value>
>>                   <value>virtio-transitional</value>
>>                   <value>virtio-non-transitional</value>
>>                 </choice>
>>               </attribute>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> what is relation between them?
>
> In your top cut, you have a specific SCSI adapter being selected
> for emulation.
>
> In the bottom, you have 9 different choices, of which you will
> pick one.
>
> The specific LSI 53c810 / 53c895a are not supported in qemu, but
> it's possibly that the lsilogic emulator will work.

Sorry, I do not understand.
If  LSI 53c810 / 53c895a is not supported, how output
"qemu-system-x86_64 -device help" should be interpreted?

KJ

-- 
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the
month than you did before.


Reply to: