On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote: > OK, I will studz and try the manz options you have explain to me. > > > Your posts are sometimes nearly... whimsical. > > Many of you have tell me such things, "you should know that ... " > "why do you even ask if it is so easz to find the answer on the > Internet?" ... Don't take it personally. It was just a short form of "I'm unsure whether I have managed to interpret your meaning correctly, so please watch out for the possibility that I got that totally wrong" or something like that. So please understand that rather as "I'm not sure I've managed to decode you correctly, so watch out and help, please". > Posts are not "whimsical" per se, what makes it so if the impedance > in the assumptions framed by your background and someone else s > conditions/reality. Like right now i have to type using two keyboards > ... Definitely. I was just stating my impression, which has as much to do with me as with you as with the medium in-between. That said, of course "Your posts are ... whimsical" sounds much more absolute than it was meant to. > I am in Germany right now living in a half way house without access > to the Internet ... (you donät want to know more ;-)) Ah, that sound äxciting :) > Also, the kinds of problems I work on (corpora research of free text) > are kind of demanding, zou cant "solve" such problems nicely with OOP > and such paradigms, because zou cant model text with DAGs . That sounds even more exciting. Confusion networks? Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature