Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:02:14PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:45:53PM +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Long story short, if you need a primitive I/O benchmark, you're better
> > with both dsync and nocache.
>
> Thanks for actually looking over dd's shoulder :-)
You're welcome. strace(1), dear list readers, it's strace(1).
Have it, love it, use it.
Reco
Reply to:
- References:
- Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...