Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:45:53PM +0300, Reco wrote:
[...]
> Long story short, if you need a primitive I/O benchmark, you're better
> with both dsync and nocache.
Thanks for actually looking over dd's shoulder :-)
Cheers
-- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ...
- From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>