Re: Buster without systemd?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Buster without systemd?
- From: kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca)
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:38:07 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87o8sm7wsw.fsf@alfa.kjonca>
- In-reply-to: <zNP8u-58b-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (Andrei POPESCU's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:40:02 +0100")
- References: <zNACu-4JR-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNACu-4JR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNACu-4JR-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNACu-4JR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNACu-4JR-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNACu-4JR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNP8u-58b-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> writes:
> On Lu, 23 mar 20, 19:51:18, Kamil Jońca wrote:
>> But now systemd wants:
>> - manage network interfaces
>> - do name resolving
>> - and so on.
>> and quite often it cannot do it properly (ie. with little more
>> complicated configuration).
>
> systemd-networkd is not meant to do very complicated configurations.
But always try :) systemd-resolved also.
I lost a lot of time struggling with systemd-resoved (I wasn't aware of
its existence), guessing why my dnsmasq stopped working properly.
I simply like unix approach ("do one thing") and systemd is against it.
KJ
--
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
Reply to: