Re: Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies
> > $ apt-cache policy libtiff-dev libtiff5
>
> The command (w/ libidn2-0 added) reports:
>
> libtiff-dev:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 4.0.10-4
> Version table:
> 4.0.10-4 500
> 500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable/main amd64 Packages
> libtiff5:
> Installed: 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1
> Candidate: 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1
> Version table:
> *** 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1 100
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 4.0.10-4 500
> 500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable/main amd64 Packages
> libidn2-0:
> Installed: 2.0.5-1+deb10u1
> Candidate: 2.0.5-1+deb10u1
> Version table:
> *** 2.0.5-1+deb10u1 100
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 2.0.5-1 500
> 500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable/main amd64 Packages
>
Your installed versions of libtiff5 and libidn2-0 are the same as the versions currently in the buster security updates. Contrast:
$ apt-cache policy libtiff-dev libtiff5 libidn2-0
libtiff-dev:
Installed: 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1
Candidate: 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1
Version table:
*** 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1 990
990 http://security.debian.org buster/updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
4.0.10-4 990
990 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster/main amd64 Packages
libtiff5:
Installed: 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1
Candidate: 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1
Version table:
*** 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1 990
990 http://security.debian.org buster/updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
4.0.10-4 990
990 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster/main amd64 Packages
libidn2-0:
Installed: 2.0.5-1+deb10u1
Candidate: 2.0.5-1+deb10u1
Version table:
*** 2.0.5-1+deb10u1 990
990 http://security.debian.org buster/updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2.0.5-1 990
990 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster/main amd64 Packages
It looks as though you have installed from security.debian.org but now it's not in your sources.list. If you add a line like
deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
then do "apt-get update", does that help the "apt-get build-dep"?
--
Cheers,
Clive
Reply to: