Re: Difference between ipp, ipps, http, https CUPS protocols?

[Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Brian wrote:
> On Thu 14 Nov 2019 at 11:12:38 -0000, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Sorting by "newest" on their (laser / color led) models listing results
>> in the "HL-L3270CDW" being listed as "newest" -- digging around, it
>> seems that it's a 2018 model.  Still has LPR/LPD listed under the
>> "Protocols" sections (both IPv4 and v6, actually).
>> 
>> I would expect that pretty much everything of theirs (well, at least in
>> terms of "business lineup") would then still support it. Their site
>> seems a bit broken right now (or perhaps it's on my end), so I can't get
>> at the 'home' stuff to check.
>
> One would think that a business machine supporting the LPD protocol
> would cost a vendor pennies. After all, the vendor doesn't have to
> do much when they already have the code to put in their firmware.

Yup, if that.  

>
> What is more interesting is why a user thinks that the LPD protocol
> gives them something that IPP doesn't.

Who said that LPR/LPD gave people "something" that IPP doesn't?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl3N6NYACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooGr7ggAlTy7whKBgKxJORrjavO2+GmJWPp9Zsaei64Vwrm0SEJ2Wor5pa0FbleO
kZXVVVfzXiy9ZWbqhEkR7SZ5zK1Qb8kweluhtYh44sPtkCCwcJi762pJvVqh5wmw
RozqqgFcRNKrnfANJohBU2IdA7qH+QjgRkPS92OhquwqXSZydMD84Zr3+dpHW8L7
KrSpYdnfMQxkQlnEtECRX1NCKMpUZRpkaTOMW0fxOBkgmbvt2Up62Aobay+THmAG
cTKJjMnxN88e15HfAUebXyVBHyj87sQK/q1BUROKQnJaC+pgT1eEubdLI7cnvpQ4
L4O7/yS7IONX0xZr5p2+oAFcdT8gBg==
=HHT2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
|_|O|_| 
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5  4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281