Re: Off topic: Carbon. Was: Off topic: remaja (teens)
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Juhwohl. "Please" with exclamation mark is to be considered imperial.
> Tsuck Marsh.
>
No - you missed some forms in school. For example
Der Imperativ ist im Deutschen sehr gebräuchlich, weil wir hier mit wenigen
Wörtern sagen können, was der andere tun soll. Für Nicht-Muttersprachler
klingt diese Form manchmal etwas unhöflich, das ist aber normalerweise
nicht so gemeint. Natürlich kommt es immer auf den Ton an. Um höflicher zu
klingen, können wir das Wörtchen bitte verwenden.
Beispiel:
Fahren Sie mich bitte zum Bahnhof!
Schnallen Sie sich bitte an!
https://deutsch.lingolia.com/de/grammatik/verben/imperativ
>
>> No idea why you tend to overcomplicate things
>
> I have to admit that
> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treibhauseffekt
> is much more 4 pi R ^ 2 than
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect
>
too much wrong thinking - there are two fraction in science- mainstream
supports CO2 lie. Look at arguments on both sides from real scientists (Not
the face Potsdamer Institut für Klimaforschung <- these are fake).
>
>> Watch this and think https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpTHi7O66pI
>
> Isn't the combination of "youtube" and "think" a classical oxymoron ?
>
No - it is TED talks - science for people like you and me
> If the video is about growing biomass: What grows must rot some day,
> unless it gets sedimented. Biomass has to wander from the athmospheric
> carbon cycle to the geological cycle in order to get climate-inactive
> for a longer time.
> I.e. the surplus unearthed carbon must be burried again, not vitalized.
>
> Not to forget that biomass tends to produce methane, which is worse
> than carbon dioxide for about twenty years before it becomes carbon
> dioxide.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
Again too much thinking - you should be making cars, no thinking too much :D
It is repetitive pattern in my experiences - some friends left Germany for
good reasons and they are born Germans.
regards
Reply to: