Re: text editors
tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> That would be a fatal mistake, indeed. But there's another hurdle,
> which is not to be subestimated. Emacs, as an old program, comes
> along with an old culture, with its own lispeltongue (i.e. "point"
> instead of "cursor", "window" for "sub-frame", etc.). It takes a
> while to understand that it's totally worh it to embrace this mysterious
> language/culture.
exactly - learning emacs means learning lisp - what for? I switched years
ago to ne.
Reply to: