On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:27:01AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 22 Mar 2019 at 17:45:50 (+0100), tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > Reading the OP's problem, I wonder how you're meant to detect > "any whiff of a problem" [...] Torture tests. > The main concern raised in the OP was flushing before termination, > for which a signal is ideal. And for best performance, I'd forget > tee and just look at the output file occasionally, with tail. A signal handler is definitely an option, but it can be pretty tricky. Especially if you are catching things like SEGV (you dare a write() after that?) Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature