[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

(solved)Re: do you find old firefox is better than new one?



i've just installed 60.3.0
it seems better than 52.9.0

Thanks to all who reply!




On Monday, December 17, 2018, 11:22:47 PM GMT+8, Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> wrote:


On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC)
Long Wind <longwind2@yahoo.com> wrote:

>  Thank Stefan!  i'll try 60.4.0 tomorrow.

Don't use Firefox-esr myself, although it's installed and up-to-date as
a back up. Use Firefox Quantum 64.0. No issues, but no add-ons or
extensions installed other than the defaults and Abdobe flashplayer for
those sites that require it.  My primary browser is Chrome with minimal
plugins.  I like to keep things simple. Less problems. Use Stretch.

B


>    On Monday, December 17, 2018, 7:19:59 PM GMT+8, Stefan K <shadow_7@gmx.net> wrote: 

>  #yiv7133287840 p, #yiv7133287840 li {white-space:pre-wrap;}

> Hi Long Wind,
>
>  
>
> I use 60.4.0esr on Debian Stretch on a Lenovo T460, bevor I use Google Chrome (cause it can handle a lot of open tabs, and use for every tab a seperate process). With the 60.4.0esr everything works fine, at the moment I've more than 70 tabs open (in my "main" firefox window) and everything works fine.
>
> At the moment I don't use Chrome anymore, cause since FF Quantum, Mozilla did a great job with that. It's fast, never crashed and it just working. A hint: I delete all my .mozilla-files before, so I started with a "fresh" firefox profile. I guess thats a reason why I dont have problems ;)
>
>  
>
> best regards
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 16, 2018 9:32:07 AM CET Long Wind wrote:
>
>
> i have 52.9.0 and 45.9.0, both for stretch
>
>
> new one often becomes unresponsive,
>
>
> and i have to close it and restart it
> it often happens when i first start it
>
>
> maybe some function/service is blocked in China
>
>
> it seems it's doing something impossible, and takes much cpu resource
>
>
> but old firefox also face blocking
>
>
>
> i can't describe it in more details or reproduce problem
>
>
>
>
>


Reply to: