[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Failed to load libGL



On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:41:48 +0100
mb <nc-bierhoma@netcologne.de> wrote:

> On 15.11.18 19:20, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:32:47 +0100
> > mb <nc-bierhoma@netcologne.de> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi!
> >> I am running a newly installed Debian stretch stable 64Bit.
> >> When i try to execute a game via wine or playonlinux i get an error like
> >> this:
> >>
> >> 0009:err:wgl:init_opengl Failed to load libGL: libGL.so.1: cannot open
> >> Shared-Object-File: File not found

...

> >> More info:
> >> file
> >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
> >> exists and points to
> >> /etc/alternatives/glx--libGL.so.1-x86_64-linux-gnu
> >>
> >> I am running the prop. nvidia driver 390.87 installed stretch-backports.
> > 
> > The OpenGL situation can be pretty complicated on Debian. I'm no
> > expert, but I did recently spend some time wrangling with Debian OpenGL
> > packages. What is the output of: 'dpkg -S libGL.so.1 | grep ^libgl1'?
> > 
> > On my Sid system (a laptop with Optimus graphics - an integrated Intel
> > GPU + an Nvidia one), I have:
> > 
> > ~$ dpkg -S libGL.so.1 | grep ^libgl1
> > libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libGL.so.1
> > libgl1:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.7.0
> > libgl1:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
> > libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libGL.so.1
> > libgl1:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.7.0
> > libgl1:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
> > 
> > Celejar
> > 
> 
> I am slightly worried because i assume if my specific problem was common 
> google would provide better hits.
> 
> $ dpkg -S libGL.so.1 | grep ^libgl1
> libgl1:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
> libgl1:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.7.0


Perhaps install libgl1-nvidia-glx (and libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 if you
need 32 bit support) and see if that helps?

> Thank you for spending the time.
> Martin

Celejar


Reply to: