On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:26:37AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:20:57PM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
One of dash's design goals is to be a purely POSIX compatible shell*,
Fear not, I'm not confusing it with posh(1). That's my reading of the
The current version of dash is in the process of being changed to
conform with the POSIX 1003.2 and 1003.2a specifications for the
Only features designated by POSIX, plus a few Berkeley extensions, are
being incorporated into this shell.
Yeah. It's not meant to be a litmus test for whether your script refrains
from using any extensions. It's not a compliance-testing tool.
It isn't indeed, that would be posh(1).
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.