Re: libressl in Buster?
On 11/1/18 4:16 PM, Reco wrote:
> It's rather a short release cycle and a lack of feature parity with
I don't see a short release cycle as a bad feature. Its a sign of
active and agile development.
Openssl has a bad reputation for introducing security problems,
partly due to its complex and "dangerous code", which was the
major reason for the fork.
I am not asking to drop openssl or to port all projects to libressl.
It just would be nice being able to chose.