Re: libressl in Buster?

[Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de>]

On 11/1/18 4:16 PM, Reco wrote:
> 
> It's rather a short release cycle and a lack of feature parity with
> openssl.
> 

I don't see a short release cycle as a bad feature. Its a sign of
active and agile development.

Openssl has a bad reputation for introducing security problems,
partly due to its complex and "dangerous code", which was the
major reason for the fork.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreSSL#History

I am not asking to drop openssl or to port all projects to libressl.
It just would be nice being able to chose.


Regards
Harri