On 25/08/2018 05:45, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Friday, 24 Aug 2018 at 20:15, Reco wrote:-INT_MAX. I win.-1 (wraps around so = INT_MAX) and I win!
No, it is the other way around for two's complement: INT_MIN = -INT_MAX - 1Two's complement is unbalanced. You do not know the power of the dark (negative) side.
For example, for signed 32-bit integers using two's complement (C/C++ int on most current architectures and JVM int).
INT_MAX = 2**31 - 1 = 2147483647 INT_MIN = -2**31 = -2147483648 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer_(computer_science) Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/> New Zealand