Aw: Re: does btrfs have a future? (was: feature)
Did you think that "only" the RAID5/6 problem is the reason why btrfs is not so common? what is with the performance? and some (important) featrures (not futures ;) ) are missing to catch up ZFS.
(sorry for my bad english)
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2018 um 21:09 Uhr
> Von: "Matthew Crews" <email@example.com>
> An: "Anders Andersson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: "Debian users mailing list" <email@example.com>
> Betreff: Re: does btrfs have a future? (was: feature)
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On August 14, 2018 6:54 AM, Anders Andersson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Stefan K Shadow_7@gmx.net wrote:
> > Before people start discussingfeatures, note that OP uses the
> > mostly non-standard spelling "feature" when he means "future".
> Good catch, I thought the subject was strange.
> I think btrfs does have a future once they work out the Raid5/6 write hole, and patch in a few quality of life changes.
> On the other hand, if ZFS is ever relicensed to be GPL-compatible (and therefore includable in the Linux kernel directly), then I think that will kill btrfs outright.