Re: kernel 4.14.15 compilation using GCC 8 in unstable.......

[Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@gmail.com>]

On 27 January 2018 at 12:43, Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> wrote:

Hi,

On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:12:57 +0000
Michael Fothergill <michael.fothergill@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> ​Should the filename be something like linux-image-4.14.14.deb etc?

With default settings for make-kpkg the filename is probably a little
longer, here it looks like

linux-image-4.15.0-rc9-klappnase270118_4.15.0-rc9-klappnase270118-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb


>
> Maybe Greg could think some find command that would search everywhere in
> the install I have here and then find it in some funny directory (even
> /tmp?) no one has ever heard of.
>
> I would be grateful for suggestions here.
>
> Could there be a bug in gcc 8 that made it forget to actually output the
> file?

I don't think that gcc is to blame. Did you look at the final messages
make-kpkg printed? If run successfully it should say something like
"building package linux-image-..." .

​It never did it.   It did this at the end:​

 

chmod 0644 debian/control debian/changelog
make -f debian/rules debian/stamp/conf/kernel-conf
make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-4.14.15'
make[2]: 'debian/stamp/conf/kernel-conf' is up to date.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-4.14.15'
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-4.14.15'
echo done > debian/stamp/conf/minimal_debian
exec debian/rules  
nothing to be done.

​and stopped.

if you look through the rest of the output I posted above its not there AFAICT.

Cheers

MF​

Regards

Michael


.-.. .. ...- .   .-.. --- -. --.   .- -. -..   .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-.

Power is danger.
                -- The Centurion, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2