Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd
On 2017-12-08, Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 12:17 +0100, deloptes wrote:
>> Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>> > Basically, it was a completely inconsistent mess before systemd.
>> > Now you at least have a central place where you can configure your
>> > system behaviour.
>>
>> This is your opinion - if you can not understand the "mess" it is a
>> mess.
>> For most of us who dislike systemd your same statement is valid. I do
>> not
>> understand it and it is a mess. So we have 1:1 :)
>> Perhaps we like the old mess better than the new mess ;-)
>>
>> Please do not try to impose your opinion on others. Free software is
>> free
>> for this reason and we want to stay like this. We respect each others
>> opinion.
>
> I think you are allowing your dislike of systemd to cloud the truth of
> Michael's statement.
>
The OP was flameware.
Nobody's embarrassed; there is no bug; nothing is "in systemd."
There was a policy decision.
Thus denuded of inflationary rhetoric the OP boils down to a parental
guidance problem (joke).
--
"The world is full of shipping clerks who have read the Harvard Classics."
— Charles Bukowski
Reply to: