On 01/12/17 22:59, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
On 01.12.2017 22:19, Michael Biebl wrote:Isn't AppArmor required in buster and also required in stretch-backports linux-image? Of course AppArmor can be disabled completely or partially if profile for some application is broken, but it is not just recommended package now.I think it might be useful to open a (wishlist) bug report against the linux package to not add the recommends when building for stretch-backports
Yes, if I'm pretty sure it wasn't just recommended, but it was required--if I remember right I had no choice.