Re: [Stretch] apt-get has no updates?
- To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: [Stretch] apt-get has no updates?
- From: Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 09:28:12 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAAr43iNkgjLSU7ONX3nQsvtU98+-jvZfw3dMw5pZWffpTdcqZQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20170630200534.vu45ohyeimuuvldc@ddeb.ddeb.net>
- References: <1fbfbd3b-55ff-3c31-48c1-47c4a9a7c22f@sitesplace.net> <20170630140648.pssrs6vntvfqtspl@ddeb.ddeb.net> <ff002796-1644-29a4-f49a-b02222cf771f@sitesplace.net> <20170630163449.juuuj3ribl37pfvj@ddeb.ddeb.net> <20170630170430.GN4028@eeg.ccf.org> <20170630200534.vu45ohyeimuuvldc@ddeb.ddeb.net>
(Not looking for answers, just using the list to remind myself of
something in the future.)
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30-06-17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 06:34:49PM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
>> > If you want to
>> > prevent automatic upgrades and disable them, because you want to do it
>> > manually like you are used to, you should edit file
>> > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20auto-upgrades and change it from this:
>> >
>> > APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists "1";
>> > APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrade "1";
>> >
>> > to this:
>> >
>> > APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists "0";
>> > APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrade "0";
>>
>> Or you can just remove the unattended-upgrades package, right?
>>
>
> Sure, if you want to.
[mark (reiisi): python-dependencies ]
> On gnome, it is pulled in because of
> gnome-packagekit which recommends software-properties-gtk which depends
> on python3-software-properties which recommends unattended-upgrades.
[end-mark]
> Personally would leave it on, because I like to have it in case that I
> become lazy with my daily routine and because I like to look at various
> things and understand how they work. But if OP does not need it, it is
> safe to remove/purge it.
>
>
>
--
Joel Rees
One of these days I'll get someone to pay me
to design a language that combines the best of Forth and C.
Then I'll be able to leap wide instruction sets with a single #ifdef,
run faster than a speeding infinite loop with a #define,
and stop all integer size bugs with my bare cast.
http://defining-computers.blogspot.com/2017/06/reinventing-computers.html
More of my delusions:
http://reiisi.blogspot.com/2017/05/do-not-pay-modern-danegeld-ransomware.html
http://reiisi.blogspot.jp/p/novels-i-am-writing.html
Reply to: