Re: Rsync
On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 08:47:48PM +0000, Brian wrote:
>
> Nano is an editor. So is vim-tiny. Both are in the base system. Why two
> editors? I suppose they cater for different audiences. Or tastes. (And
> history plays a part). Don't fight it.
>
As far as vim-tiny, vi is specified/required [0] in POSIX.1-2008. On
the other hand, nano is probably easier to manage for a user who is not
already familiar with vi. I can certainly see why both are included.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/vi.html
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rsync
- From: Joe <joe@jretrading.com>
- Re: Rsync
- From: Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
- References:
- Rsync
- From: Fred Ringwald <fred@ringwald.org>
- Re: Rsync
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>
- Re: Rsync
- From: deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com>
- Re: Rsync
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>
- Re: Rsync
- From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
- Re: Rsync
- From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
- Re: Rsync
- From: Weaver <weaver@riseup.net>
- Re: Rsync
- From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>