Re: estamated number of Linux users?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: estamated number of Linux users?
From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:21:48 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87a80dqnqr.fsf@dhh.gt.org>
Reply-to: jhasler@newsguy.com (John Hasler)
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20171026221710.8c4f05d461321c0991186f81@gmail.com> (celejar@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:17:10 -0400")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.1710262136360.8370@server2.shellworld.net> <[🔎] 20171026221710.8c4f05d461321c0991186f81@gmail.com>

Celejar writes:
> https://www.linuxcounter.net/
> I don't know how meaningful its data are.

Utterly useless.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: estamated number of Linux users?
  - From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
- Re: estamated number of Linux users?
  - From: Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com>

References:
- estamated number of Linux users?
  - From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- Re: estamated number of Linux users?
  - From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Serial Ports and Perl
Next by Date: Re: estamated number of Linux users?
Previous by thread: Re: estamated number of Linux users?
Next by thread: Re: estamated number of Linux users?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread