Re: spammers go personal
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Christian Hinch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> That's weird.
No, it's marketing. Tailored unrequested junk mail.
Once you give in to having to send messages one at a time, it isn't hard
to fake a response to a faked message, in the hopes of bringing more
uncautious people to drive by your website.
Or someone is being randomly sarcastic.
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:44 PM Fungi4All <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Well I did not get the message myself to see the headers but I got a
>> response to what appeared to be my spam by Christian Hinch
>> Re: yoshifanc_You_Qualify_for_Window_Replacemen_Rebates!_HQXL
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: yoshifanc_You_Qualify_for_Window_Replacemen_Rebates!_HQXL
>> Local Time: May 23, 2017 8:48 PM
>> UTC Time: May 23, 2017 5:48 PM
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> To: Fungi4All <email@example.com>
>> Wow! This is AMAZING! Thanks for qualifying me!
>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:01 PM Eco-Windows Fungi4All
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Free Windo--
>> Sent from Christian's Official iPad Mini Device
> Sent from Christian's Official iPad Mini Device
One of these days I'll get someone to pay me
to design a language that combines the best of Forth and C.
Then I'll be able to leap wide instruction sets with a single #ifdef,
run faster than a speeding infinite loop with a #define,
and stop all integer size bugs with a bare cast.
More of my delusions: