Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:20:02PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
[...]
> Yet, PID 1 is still the only immortal process, unless you have another
> new mutant power to produce, and that property is needed to have a
> reliable monitoring system. Otherwise, the monitoring process could be
> killed, and nobody would notice.
You keep repeating this misconception. "Could be" "nobody would". By your
logic, Apache and PostgreSQL (among many following this model) wouldn't
work. They do. Pretty reliably, at that.
Don't get me wrong: I think SysV gave up on something BSD init had,
and think it should (and could, in fact) re-gain it, but... it's not
as dramatic as (the less informed) systemd proponents would make you
believe.
Systemd has its strengths. If you managed to concentrate on those,
you would do systemd a bigger service. Spreading FUD, by contrast,
does it a disservice.
Regards
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAljwjn8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZgCwCdFJP5Gd9EVsvDSHMepS0K5d8F
eY4An0gimfOX8hTQ+bhfW8p4CJprIeqq
=L8sI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: