sorry what i meant is eth1:1 sorry my mistake.but thanks for the clarification.On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote:Le 04/03/2017 à 18:40, Dominik George a écrit :
eth:1 is nonsense.
Why ? There could be an interface named "eth".