On 8/9/2016 4:49 PM, David Wright
wrote:
On Tue 09 Aug 2016 at 13:27:34 (-0700), Seeker wrote:On 8/9/2016 4:34 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:Le 09/08/2016 à 10:44, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard a écrit :Andrew M.A. Cater:/etc/os-release just contains major versionYou are going to have to explain that to its manual page, which gives VERSION_ID=11.04 as an example of what can be in the file.This is obviously not a Debian version. Rather looks like Ubuntu.You're going to have to explain it to the Ubuntu people, as well; because they follow what the manual says.Ubuntu 11.04 is a version based on year+month of release rather than a major+minor version. Ubuntu 11.04 is as different from 11.10 as 11.10 is different from 12.04.That was my first thought too, but looking up base-files for one of the LTS releases on packages.ubuntu.com and reading the change log, looks like to do update the os-release with xx.xx.1, xx.xx.2, etc...Where was that, then? (To save us all having to search for it.) When you say "update the os-release with xx.xx.1", do you mean the VERSION_ID line? This line is optional anyway, is it not? Cheers, David.
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/b/base-files/base-files_7.2ubuntu5.5/changelog
"base-files (7.2ubuntu5.5) trusty; urgency=medium
* /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net, /etc/lsb-release, /etc/os-release: Bump
version number to 14.04.5 in preparation for the point release.
-- Adam Conrad <adconrad@ubuntu.com> Mon, 01 Aug 2016 07:48:43 -0600"
Later, Seeker
| Virus-free. www.avast.com |