Re: network setup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:14:30AM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2016 09:13:49 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Eh? How does calling something by the string "wlx00c0ca364bd2" instead
> > > of "wlan0" make it less accessible?
> >
> > Thank you! You just highlighted why I'm not staying for long in that
> > discussion. I'm out.
>
>
> This is a) incomprehensible and b) unnecessary. If you want out, just drop
> out. There is no need to imply that you are in some way forced out by
> someone else's reprehensible behaviour.
?
I really can't fathom how it's possible for you to interpret my words
as me "feeling forced to" whatever or as seeing any behaviour as
"reprehensible". So if I made that impression to anyone else, here's
my statement: no, I don't feel forced to anything (and leave this
thread in free will), and no, I don't think it's reprehensible for
anyone to have different tastes, opinions or whatever than I have.
I just stated that I dindn't want to extend this discussion forever,
because I consider it a matter of judgement/taste on which there
are many possible positions, but feelings are typically strong.
David's answer illustrated my point so beautifully that i had to
say thanks. It's up there for reference :-)
regards
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlhRLgEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYREgCeNn2YFcVaod+XxgLHmkZr8uYO
kg8An0coCKQEoHnWI9GVtoLNPHWZiXQ5
=U9Hk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: