Re: Coercing sane file permissions -- site specific
I'll answer with something a little bit like Joe's answer. On my daily
working machine, which uses Wheezy, I use Dophin as a file manager.
After I plug in a USB stick, after a few seconds (maybe up to 20??), a new
entry appears on the left hand list of partitions in Dolphin. If I click on
that, the files are displayed in the (current working) pane of Dolphin, and I
can use the mouse to drag and drop them, open them, or similar.
The top of that dophin pane shows where the device is mounted, for example,
/media/84BE-2329/.
If I then go to a CLI and refer to that mountpoint, I can access the files.
To anticipate an answer to your potential next question, there is no
pmount.allow file on this computer.
I may try the same thing on my future daily working machine, using Jessie
(and, iiuc, systemd or whatever it is called). If I try that, I'll let you
know.
On Sunday, November 20, 2016 08:58:04 AM Joe wrote:
> There *is* a generic answer, which requires no fstab entry, but I have
> to admit that I haven't a clue what it is.
>
> I'm running sid with systemd, with absolutely nothing in /etc/fstab
> which refers to USB sticks, but nonetheless any USB stick inserted is
> recognised and automounted under /media/joe (maybe immediately and maybe
> on access, I'm not sure, but it shows instantly in file managers) with
> everything in a FAT partition having ownership of joe:me and
> permissions of 644. Ext partitions have their own permissions, as
> expected.
>
> This all Just Works, and I have no idea what configuration it depends
> on. "I didn't build this," sid basically builds and rebuilds itself, so
> I tend to keep my fingers out of the works. I do know that USB sticks
> were a real pain with usbmount, which *sometimes* mounted the entire
> device instead of the partitions, and at some point, things just
> started working better.
>
> There is nothing in /etc/polkit-1, /etc/udev or /etc/udisks2 referring
> to USB sticks, which are the most likely suspects as far as I can see.
> Presumably the culprit is systemd, as usual, so possibly someone more
> knowledgable about this beast can finish my part-answer.
Reply to: