[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gparted will not label an existing FAT32 partition



Le primidi 21 brumaire, an CCXXV, David Wright a écrit :
> Any reference. You see, I find label a very slippery word.
> You can label a disk at almost every level: a sticky label,

True, but not really relevant.

> a disklabel (partition table),

This is BSD slang. But this was what I was referring to.

>				 a filesystem label,

Indeed. That is the most common one.

>						     a volume label
> (perhaps those two are equivalent),

I do not think "volume" means anything in the Linux world.

>				      and whatever is handled by
> devlabel (which might be historic).

It looks like a tool to make symlinks based on the above labels.

> So I'm unsure what you mean by a partition label, where it's
> stored, and how it differs from a filesystem label.

Well, the filesystem label is stored in the filesystem metadata, i.e.
probably the superblock. The partition label is stored in the partitions
metadata, i.e. the "partition table".

> Is it new-fangled?

MBR-style partition tables do not contain labels, if that is what you
are asking. But GPT does.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: