Jonathan Dowland wrote on 09/01/2016 03:07 AM: > > I'd report it against gscan2pdf in the first instance. The maintainers of the > package which has broken will be best equipped to figure out whether or not the > problem needs changes in the gscan2pdf package or elsewhere; the bug can always > be reassigned later if needs be. Thank you. After some thought, I had come to the same conclusion; so I'll do that when I get a chance later today. Doc -- Web: http://www.sff.net/people/N7DR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature