Re: update-rc.d creates unexpected sequence numbers
On Friday 13 May 2016 16:10:17 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 03:35:29PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > But for the above comparison to work correctly, you (and everybody
> > responding to your message) would have to post the version number of
> > the parent package that held this file too. No use comparing apples
> > to tangerines. :)
>
> Gene, you have me confused now. This is *exactly* what we did: we
> compared the version of the package containing update-rc.d and the
> program file's sha1sum. Both match.
>
> We still get different behaviours, thus there must be something
> different in the execution environment. At least we know now where
> *not* to look :-)
>
> regards
> -- tomás
Yes, I believe we are on the same page, so obviously there is something
else gone aglay in the environment as you suggested. You are I believe,
making progress in discovering that, so I'll bow out and try not to
confuse an issue about which I apparently know not well enough.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Reply to: