Re: Bond and Bridge problem

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bond and Bridge problem
From: Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:34:43 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 56EFCE43.3090109@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAAKASGzcDNOEkAM1GX_DzYsZ2q6Vb+s6KJqgRii-b-WZ2AERTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 56EEE6CD.1000608@gmail.com> <[🔎] CAAKASGzcDNOEkAM1GX_DzYsZ2q6Vb+s6KJqgRii-b-WZ2AERTA@mail.gmail.com>

On 21.03.2016 09:31, Igor Cicimov wrote:

 > The problem is when I do `service networking restart` I get this message:
 >         RTNETLINK answers: invalid argument
 >         Failed to bring up br0



I found the rout cause of this error:

ip link set dev br0 mtu 9000  up
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Failed to bring up br0.

And the rest options (like adding default gateway) stops processing.

Isn't incorrect to specify mtu 9000 to bridges?

How about bonds? Or, to which interfaces mtu is valable?

Reply to:

References:
- Bond and Bridge problem
  - From: Mimiko <vbvbrj@gmail.com>
- Re: Bond and Bridge problem
  - From: Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bond and Bridge problem [Off-list]
Next by Date: Re: Bond and Bridge problem
Previous by thread: Re: Bond and Bridge problem
Next by thread: Re: Bond and Bridge problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread