[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Throughput riddle



On 03/20/2016 07:10 PM, Celejar wrote:
Laptop:

RX packets:922215 errors:0 dropped:1967 overruns:0 frame:0
           TX packets:1186319 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
           RX bytes:724785210 (691.2 MiB)  TX bytes:1311193642 (1.2 GiB)

NAS:

  RX packets:509256 errors:0 dropped:3 overruns:0 frame:0
           TX packets:234641 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
           RX bytes:767110212 (731.5 MiB)  TX bytes:16498728 (15.7 MiB)
           Interrupt:87


Router (wireless interface):

  RX packets:1474219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
           TX packets:1571154 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
           RX bytes:994970603 (948.8 MiB)  TX bytes:1544655324 (1.4 GiB)

Assuming:

1.  The configuration is:

	laptop - WiFi - router - Cat 5 - NAS

2.  You did a cold boot on everything.

3.  You ran iperf from the laptop to the NAS.

4.  You ran iperf from the NAS to the laptop.


Ideas:

1. I assume the dropped RX statistic means that received packets were malformed, and not that they were dropped by a firewall rule (?).

2. The laptop WiFi interface dropping 1967 packets while the router WiFi interface dropping zero leads me to think there's a problem that only affects the laptop receiver. Perhaps you need turn up the transmitter power in the router (?).

3. I don't understand why the NAS dropped 3 packets. A wired connection should drop zero. Maybe it's the Cat 5 cable. Perhaps you need a Cat 5E.

4. The laptop TX bytes (1.2 GiB) and NAS RX bytes (731.5 MiB) do not correlate well.

5. The NAS TX bytes (15.7 MiB) and laptop RX bytes (691.2 MiB) do not correlate well.

6.  Information for the router wired interface is missing.


Please try another run per my assumptions, above. Revise and re-post assumptions as necessary. Post new ifconfig, iwconfig, dmesg, and anything else that looks like a clue.


David


Reply to: