Re: Failure of evince to open a PDF.
On Sunday 07 February 2016 09:43:05 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 07 February 2016 07:28:54 Wilko Fokken wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 01:26:30PM -0800, peter@easthope.ca wrote:
> > > Updated a jessie system this morning. Then tried evince.
> > >
> > > evince afile.pdf
> > >
> > > A window entitled "Document Viewer" with this notice popped
> > > open. "Unable to open document "file:///home/peter/afile.pdf".
> > > File type HTML document (text/html) is not supported
> >
> > (Are your access rights ok?)
>
> If he has just now downloaded "afile.pdf", I have run into that too,
> some sites are new feeding you a dummy html file when you click on the
> download link and save-as. I've had to go back to the site and use a
> different method, that small html file, when a winderz machine execs
> it, gets the real file. Its a PITA, they are doing that I presume to
> inflate the hit count. Those sites should be named and shamed IMO.
>
> How about we start that list with CBSNEWS.com and their use of a cache
> server that calls itself "varnish cache server" They put up a url to
> a story thats north of 220 chars long, but the cache server is setup
> to reject any request over 80 chars long. So you register the hit,
> but they don't have to pay for the bandwidth to serve an interesting
> news tidbit because all we see is "request entity too long, along with
> a guru number that changes when you hit the f5 key to see if it will
> reload and work. Don't bother, it won't. Googling for it gets
> 280,000 hits.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
But I did learn something from the googling, call up iceweasels prefs,
find the cookies, and nuke any and all cbs related cookies. And now it
seems to be working, about 100x faster than it has in yonks.
So there is one possible fix for a very aggravating "feature" somebody
has invented.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Reply to: