[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Recovering data from a Raid 1Sata HD



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:49:54AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:11:08 +0000
> Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday 23 December 2015 10:23:41 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 07:41:00AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> > > > Given a Sata HD that was part of a RAID1 array on a now defunct Wheezy
> > > > system.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way to mount it on another Wheezy system to recover the data ?
> > > >
> > > > I have tried to mount it, and get
> > > >
> > > > root@ron:/home/ron # mount -t ext4 /dev/sdi9 /media/eSata
> > > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdi9,
> > > >        missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> > > >        In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> > > >        dmesg | tail  or so
> > > >
> > > > What file type should I give for the -t param of mount ?
> 
> > > Try to omit the explicit file system ("-t ext4") in the mount
> > > invocation above: mount should be able to find out by itself --
> > > unless you positively know that ext4 is right.
> 
> > If it is demanding a file type, how about  "-t auto"?
> 
> root@ron:/home/ron # mount /dev/sdi9 /media/eSata
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> 
> root@ron:/home/ron # mount -t auto /dev/sdi9 /media/eSata
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type

That means mount can't guess what filesystem is on /dev/sdi9. I fear we
won't be better at it. But you could try something like:

  sudo dd if=/dev/sdi9 bs=1024 count=1 | file -

Perhaps 'file' can shed some light onto it (it doesn't always)

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlZ6lJIACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYRQgCePkCV+fbq8Y9QKzkSBdQQFrzT
GAgAn2cWIzhjNnpg68iKaCzAoVlsuNMT
=LdsL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: