[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Trying to remove "architecture i386"

boudiccas@skimble.plus.com wrote:
>Ansgar Burchardt <"Ansgar Burchardt"@43-1.org> writes:
>> Do you still have any i386 packages installed? I think running
>>   dpkg -l "*:i386"
>> should list them (I don't use multiarch myself, but it works for the
>> native architecture and "*:all").
>> Ansgar
>Thanks Ansgar.
>--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>dpkg -l "*:i386"
>| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
>|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
>||/ Name                      Version           Architecture      Description
>rc  crossover                 14.1.11-1         i386              Run Windows applications like MS Office
>rc  libasound2:i386           1.0.28-1          i386              shared library for ALSA applications
>rc  libc6:i386                2.19-18+deb8u1    i386              GNU C Library: Shared libraries
>rc  libc6-i686:i386           2.19-18+deb8u1    i386              GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized]
>rc  libxxf86vm1:i386          1:1.1.3-1+b1      i386              X11 XFree86 video mode extension library


>rc  zlib1g:i386               1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 i386              compression library - runtime
>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>Wow, that *is* a lot! But I don't think that they're all installed, ATM.
>I don't know what the "rc" means though.

It's not the clearest unless you're looking for it, but it's in the
header at the top of the output. "r" means "Remove", "c" means
"Conf-files", i.e. the packages have been (or are about to be) removed
but still have configuration left. A normally installed package would
be shown as "ii", by comparison.

Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
 whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
 Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html

Reply to: