[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NFS rename sometimes hangs for 15 seconds after upgrade to Debian 8



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Am 28.09.2015 um 18:59 schrieb Mike Kupfer:
> Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> 
>> The big difference happens at packets 58/54 (Deb7/Deb8). For
>> Deb7, the RENAME call is immediately answered by an NFS4_OK,
>> whereas for Deb8 as the client it's an NFS4ERR_DELAY. I haven't
>> seen any reason on the client communication that would explain
>> that, however this is far beyond my knowledge of the NFS
>> internals.
> 
> The DELAY response in the deb8 trace is likely so that the server
> can ask the .3 client to return its delegation, which it does at
> packets 56-57.  (The .3 client obtained its delegation at packet 39
> as part of the reply to the OPEN op.)
> 
> In the deb7 trace, the other client is .4, not .3.  It does not get
> a delegation when it opens file2 (see packet 39), so the server
> can process the RENAME immediately.
> 
> mike
> 

Hang on, the two traces haven't been made at the same time, but rather
separate. As in:

* mount the share on 2 machines
* create the files on one
* cat it on the other
* time mv again on the first
* umount the share

However, the captures omit the mount/umount part, since that doesn't
appear to affect the outcome.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=+m/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: