Re: pptp-based vpn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 02:56:21PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 August 2015 14:04:37 martin.m@suddenlink.net wrote:
> > Now think, for a second how much money it costs to outfit
> > a van [...]
> They have a much simpler solution. They barely bother with the vans (they
> exist, I believe, though I have never seen one). They see a house. They see
> an electoral register. They assume a television. They check for a licence.
> No licence? They assume criminality. And start bullying.
Over here in Germany, they found a better solution: if you have a compuer and
an Internet connection, you technically have a TV set. Since everyone has
this, every household has to pay up (yes, they relaxed things to per-household,
except for commercial entities, where it gets complicated).
To me, it's just a thinly veiled way of moving things to a flat-tax scheme,
for the benefit of the rich (yes, I know about the official rationale)
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlXLWS0ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kafkQCdGuoN26WCviuDOqFeoczFbbgv
U3kAn1uhqE8w6z4K7gtHNoDEaatjeIkV
=tJWP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: