Re: the State of Linux Audio
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 22:19:26 Martin Read wrote:
> On 15/07/15 21:44, Nicolas George wrote:
> > In my opinion, PulseAudio is only good for messing things up. The
> > features it brings are of doubtful usefulness for most users and the
> > brittleness and complexity it introduces are very real.
>
> For a contrasting angle on this, I've found Debian with PA to be a
> considerably more relaxing-to-handle audio experience than Debian
> _without_ PA ever was.
Agreed! It lets one use pavucontrol, which I really like.
Lisi
Reply to: